Article
Canine Osteoarthritis Pain Management Companion Animal Practice Canine Physiotherapy Veterinary Rehabilitation Veterinary Orthopaedics Low-Level Laser Therapy LLLT Therapeutic Ultrasound Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy ESWT Electrotherapy Interferential Current Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation NMES Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation TENS Mobility Improvement Rehabilitation Medicine Chronic Joint Disease

Advanced Physiotherapy Modalities for Canine Osteoarthritis: Clinical Applications and Current Evidence

Physiotherapy for canine osteoarthritis (OA) extends beyond therapeutic exercises and lifestyle modification. A range of advanced physiotherapeutic modalities is available to complement multimodal OA management, with the goals of reducing pain, improving function, enhancing mobility, and supporting long-term quality of life. Most of these interventions require specialized equipment and trained personnel, making them suitable additions once foundational management strategies have been established. While several modalities have shown encouraging clinical outcomes, the strength of evidence varies, and treatment selection should be individualized according to the patient's clinical presentation and therapeutic objectives1

Low-Level Laser Therapy 

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a non-invasive modality that utilizes near-infrared or infrared light. Proposed therapeutic effects include analgesia and modulation of inflammation through multiple biological mechanisms1,2

Clinical use in dogs with naturally occurring OA has demonstrated improvements in lameness and pain scores, with progressive benefits observed over multiple treatment sessions. In some patients, analgesic medication requirements were reduced during the treatment period. Importantly, no adverse effects have been reported in canine or human OA patients receiving laser therapy1

Despite these encouraging findings, treatment protocols differ considerably with respect to wavelength, dosage, treatment frequency, and application sites, making direct comparison between protocols difficult. Optimal joint-specific treatment parameters have yet to be established1,3,4

Therapeutic Ultrasound 

Therapeutic ultrasound (TU) combines thermal and non-thermal effects to address periarticular soft tissues and joint dysfunction. Traditionally, it has been incorporated into rehabilitation programmes to reduce muscle shortening and hypertonicity, particularly before stretching exercises1,5,6

Beyond its thermal effects, ultrasound has demonstrated anti-inflammatory cellular responses and favourable effects on cartilage metabolism, supporting its role as an adjunctive treatment for osteoarthritis1,7,8

In an experimental canine OA model, repeated ultrasound treatments improved synovial fluid viscosity, joint range of motion, muscle mass, and limb loading. However, important clinical questions regarding treatment frequency, dosage, and the comparative effectiveness of continuous versus pulsed ultrasound remain unresolved1,9

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy 

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has become an important physiotherapeutic option for selected osteoarthritic patients. Both focused and radial shockwave technologies are used in veterinary practice, with differences in tissue penetration and energy distribution1

Clinical outcomes have varied according to the affected joint. Improvements in objective gait parameters have been reported in dogs with elbow and hip OA, whereas similar benefits were not consistently observed in dogs with stifle OA. Positive effects have included improved peak vertical force, vertical impulse, lameness scores, activity, and owner-assessed comfort following treatment1

Although these results are encouraging, evidence regarding long-term outcomes, ideal treatment intervals, energy settings, and frequency remains limited. Patient selection and realistic client counselling therefore remain important components of treatment planning1

Electrotherapy 

Electrotherapy encompasses several techniques that differ in their mechanisms of action and clinical application. Rather than considering electrotherapy as a single intervention, each modality should be evaluated individually according to the therapeutic goal1

Interferential current (IC) has demonstrated improvements in limb loading, pain control, oedema reduction, muscle relaxation, and mobility in dogs with OA, making it a promising adjunctive modality1

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be particularly valuable for patients unable to perform adequate strengthening exercises because of pain, weakness, or concurrent disease. Its primary objective is preservation or improvement of muscle mass and strength while supporting functional recovery1

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is primarily directed toward pain management. Clinical observations have demonstrated short-term improvements in limb loading following treatment, while longer treatment programmes incorporated into physiotherapy protocols have also been associated with improved weight-bearing symmetry in overweight osteoarthritic dogs1. However, sustained long-term analgesic benefits remain less clearly defined. 

Practical Clinical Insights 

  • Introduce advanced physiotherapy modalities as part of a comprehensive multimodal OA management plan rather than as standalone therapies. 
  • Select the modality according to the patient's primary clinical need, whether pain control, muscle preservation, improved mobility, or functional support. 
  • Explain to owners that treatment protocols often require multiple sessions and periodic reassessment to determine clinical response. 
  • Continue regular monitoring throughout treatment and adjust physiotherapy plans according to changes in mobility, comfort, and overall function. 
  • Recognize that although several advanced modalities demonstrate encouraging clinical outcomes, evidence supporting optimal treatment parameters and long-term efficacy continues to evolve. 

Advanced physiotherapy modalities provide veterinarians with valuable options for supporting dogs with osteoarthritis beyond conventional management. When integrated thoughtfully with exercise programmes, environmental modification, weight management, and pharmacological therapy, these interventions can contribute to improved patient comfort and functional mobility while maintaining realistic expectations regarding individual response and the current level of evidence. 

References 

1. Mille MA, McClement J, Lauer S. Physiotherapeutic strategies and their current evidence for canine osteoarthritis. Veterinary sciences. 2022 Dec 21;10(1):2. https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/1/2 

2. Mantineo M, Pinheiro JP, Morgado AM. Low-level laser therapy on skeletal muscle inflammation: evaluation of irradiation parameters. Journal of biomedical optics. 2014 Sep 1;19(9):098002-. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journalArticle/Download?fullDOI=10.1117/1.JBO.19.9.098002 

3. Barale L, Monticelli P, Raviola M, Adami C. Preliminary clinical experience of low-level laser therapy for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis-associated pain: A retrospective investigation on 17 dogs. Open Veterinary Journal. 2020 Mar 30;10(1):116-9. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ovj/article/download/194984/184168 

4. Looney AL, Huntingford JL, Blaeser LL, Mann S. A randomized blind placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on canine elbow osteoarthritis. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2018 Sep;59(9):959. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6091142/pdf/cvj_09_959.pdf 

5. Yildirim MA, Kadriye ÖN, Gökşenoğlu G. Effectiveness of ultrasound therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of the upper trapezius: randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Archives of rheumatology. 2018 Mar 23;33(4):418. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6409164/pdf/ArchRheumatol-33-418.pdf 

6. Acevedo B, Millis DL, Levine D, Guevara JL. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on calcaneal tendon heating and extensibility in dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2019 Jun 12;6:185. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2019.00185/pdf 

7. Yang Q, Nanayakkara GK, Drummer C, Sun Y, Johnson C, Cueto R, Fu H, Shao Y, Wang L, Yang WY, Tang P. Low-intensity ultrasound-induced anti-inflammatory effects are mediated by several new mechanisms including gene induction, immunosuppressor cell promotion, and enhancement of exosome biogenesis and docking. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017 Oct 23;8:818. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.00818/pdf 

8. Wu Y, Zhu S, Lv Z, Kan S, Wu Q, Song W, Ning G, Feng S. Effects of therapeutic ultrasound for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical rehabilitation. 2019 Dec;33(12):1863-75. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1arOTjvOxyB7DpfAM342U7h9_K7ITmHZD/view 

9. Zeng C, Li H, Yang T, Deng ZH, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Ding X, Lei GH. Effectiveness of continuous and pulsed ultrasound for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis and cartilage. 2014 Aug 1;22(8):1090-9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458414011510